Thursday, March 12, 2009

Travelling Portland



While the baby sleeps, I have been reading McCarthy’s Bar, a travel-guide-cum-inner-exploration by a boozy English-Irish writer named Pete McCarthy. To be honest, some of his stories seem so bizarre that it’s hard to believe they’re true. The man has a mind and a mouth that never stop chattering. Together the two of them seem to be responsible for a fair amount of anxious speculation, snarky commentary, and--I suspect--general embroiderment of reality. It makes for excellent reading.

McCarthy is propelled to wander the Emerald Isle by a sense of doubt as to whether or not he “belongs” in Ireland. Who wouldn’t want to belong to Ireland if they didn’t already? In fact, it's those who don't belong already who most want to. Ireland is loveliest to those who don’t live there permanently, I’m told. Over and over, as if he’s making his case to the reader, McCarthy wonders if he’s really Irish. Is he more Irish than the transplanted German running a hostel in an old convent? More Irish than the Italian tourists in expensive parkas who sip soda water in the pub? With two Liverpool-Irish parents both named McCarthy, I’m not sure why he feels the need to belabor the point: he’s obviously a McCarthy, and the McCarthys were Irish until the generation before him. Go back to Ireland if it makes ye feel good, say I.

But without the nattering doubt, there would be no story. It makes as good a scaffold as any, I suppose, for a string of tales centered around standing stones, standing pints of Guinness, the idiocy of tourists, the idiocy of the Irish, and more Guinness. Reading his book, I am reminded of the poignancy Ireland evokes in the children of emigrants, and the frustrations as well—so much so that I’m tempted to go back for a nice nostalgia-busting visit.

I close the book and idly start thinking to myself how you don’t really need to leave the US to get a taste of the foreign and the bizarre. Within this one sprawling country you can encounter completely foreign ways of doing and being. Within an hour of Portland—not to mention the rural South, or New Mexico—you’ll find people and places that will throw you for a loop so wild you’ll find it hard to believe you’re in the same country.

Today after the baby’s morning nap, we suit up and board the city bus for a cafe that features lunchtime folk music for small children and their families. Baby K watches the pimply guitarist with a passionate infantile intensity and crawls over to try to eat his sound cables. I distract him with his very first Cheerios, which he ignores. Nearby, a short slapping-match between two four-year-olds who hadn’t previously been introduced goes right over his head.

The music winds down just in time for us to miss the bus back to our neighborhood. Suddenly we have half an hour to kill along a desolate patch of East Burnside. We are only about 40 blocks from home, but they are unpretty, industrial, and involve a bridge and a large river. We will not hike home today. Instead we loiter near the bus stop, strolling about in the exhaust of an urban thoroughfare, marveling at particularly evil-looking examples of graffiti and particularly mangy cyclists.

We stroll downhill to the next stop, where a toothless woman with a jutting chin is sucking face with an blue-collar gentleman clad in a dirty baseball cap and plaid wool jacket. I keep moving, and the baby does not object. A fat man with a Santa-Claus beard whirs by on a small blue electric bicycle. I pretend not to look, but I can feel the baby cranking his neck to watch fellow go by. Behind the tall glass windows of the rock gym, people with time and money to burn are seriously contemplating a plastic wall as they rub chalk on their palms. We sit in a bus shelter and the baby tries to touch the graffiti.

When the bus comes, we are suddenly in close physical and olfactory proximity with an assortment of our fellow humans so eccentric and fragrant as to make me wish for staid, stodgy old Ireland. There is a black guy with mirrored glasses, fifty strands of Mardi Gras beads and old keys around his neck, and fingernails out to here. A disabled lady with stringy grey hair and a striking black mustache, who sits next to us and tells us about her grandson. A brown-skinned guy with some sort of skin infection speaks enough English to communicate that he has a son, “a junior”, K’s age.

I realize we are surrounded by the Other Half, the silent Americans who never had much to begin with, who saw no part of the last economic boom, who have been getting screwed for years, and who are on the brink of something much worse.

I may feel averse, but these people are interested in connecting with me; they sense a linkage I am slow to acknowledge. A Buddhist moment overcame me: suddenly we were all deluded beings, yearning for something we couldn’t quite comprehend, much less grasp. In our obliviousness and shortsightedness, we grasp whatever means of distraction is handy: music, drugs, Mardi-Gras beads--or Guinness, if you’re a boozy Anglo-Irish writer with an identity crisis.

Back in our neighborhood, I stop at the upscale “Artisan Bakery” for the express purpose of communing with my yuppie hipster brethren and sistern. They’re there, all right, hunched over their MacBooks, eating croissants with their babies, checking their Blackberries, tucking their perfect hair into hand knit caps for some purposeful striding in the cold sunshine. It’s a bracing re-entry into my particular cultural sphere. Just a quick stop to soak up the atmosphere and remember who we are, and we’re off down the street.

Coming toward me I spy a man with a bushy blond beard clad entirely in buckskins. They are clean, tawny, and fringed at every opportunity. On his head sits a tan leather Stetson. On his feet are tall moccasin-boots with fringed cuffs and rawhide laces. He wears a fringed tan leather jacket with extra fringe. And he’s feeling his way along with a massive red-tipped cane. He bumps into the mailbox on the corner and lurches around to cross at the same crosswalk we’re using. I sing quietly to the baby so he’ll know I’m there. The light changes and I mumble, “Let’s go,” to the baby, which he takes up as a helpful cue. He veers out of the crosswalk and bumps into the opposite curb. I’ve never seen a blind person do such a bad job of walking about. Maybe this is a candid camera spoof, or a psychology experiment. He stumbles sideways along the sidewalk until he’s in the middle of a group of people waiting for the bus.

I avoid eye contact and address the gold Sherriff’s badge hanging around his neck. “Sir, do you need any help to get where you’re going?”

“Oh, no thank you.” His voice is high and prissy, and his tone suggests long experience fending off helpful bystanders. “I’m right where I want to be, waiting for the number seventeen bus at the bus stop.”

And so he is. As are the other riders, who look at me as if I’m an idiot, trying to help a blind man get to where he already stands.

I stammer something and look up at the man’s eyes. He is wearing purple-tinted sunglasses, with a tiny sheriff’s star pasted to the center of each lense. Funny that someone who can’t see at all would take such pains to look the part of the psychedelic buckskinner. But maybe that’s just who he is.

And what am I? I walk along realizing I never have questioned whether I “belong” in Portland. I’m just here, along with the sad underclass of society, the posh upper minority, and the odd befringed blind-as-a-bat frontier sheriff. Nobody thinks to question another’s right to breathe this air and hash out a living on this land.

Oregon may resemble Ireland in its rolling green hills, and in the inhabitants who brew alcoholic beverages by any means necessary. But we do not have the fraught history of crowding, poverty, warfare, emigration and return. You just come here, or you are born here, and either way you live your life here. No one wonders if they legitimately belong here. You just do.

I sympathize with Pete McCarthy as he wrestles with his Irish identity. Occasionally I think the same thoughts myself, but in my case the question is theoretical. I already have the luxury of feeling at home here, in Portland, where the toothless and the tortured, the eccentric and the ethereal, the wealthy and the wanna-be, all live together in something resembling harmony.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Cooking

Here is what is hard: to express oneself or create something new when the child who is coming into this life as the nearest and most profound recipient of one's love is ill.

Over six weeks, the baby has slowly descended into diarrhea. Then came his illness. Even though he's no longer ill, the poop situation is worse than before. He is drained. And so part of me is drained. There is the constant nursing--he eats more from Cafe Mom now than he did two months ago. But more depleting is the worry: the low-level ache that something is wrong; the problem-solving head on addressing of the issue, again and again; the flicker of fear when the pediatrician says she's out of ideas; the whipping flames of terror when I realize he doesn't eat, he's dehydrated, his poops are completely watery, he's losing weight, he isn't his sparkly curious self, and there's no explanation why.

A renowned ND has been called. Some remedies have been ingested. The effluent may be firming up; it is less frequent for sure. We are waiting for a cancellation. In the meantime a tub of baby diarrhea sits in the fridge, ready for delivery to the lab tomorrow.

Meanwhile, I hold him and look into his eyes as he nurses. You are here with us, I tell him. Papa and I will always take care of you.

I have taken special care to make sure his naps are regular, his fluid intake is ample, his days filled with both security and stimulation. Every once in a while a bloggable idea overtakes me, but it just isn't important. There is nothing as important as this child's health.

Today he ate a bit: chicken bits and applesauce and some nutrient-loaded muffins I concocted in his honor. Things are looking up, and it is on that thread of hope that I find the strength to write.

Muffins for a Sick Baby Who Still Loves Baked Goods


1. Preheat oven to 350F

2. Combine:

3 c. whole wheat flour
1/2 c. wheat germ
2 tsp baking powder
1 tsp baking soda
1 tsp spices

3. Blend thoroughly:

2 eggs
1/4 c. olive oil
1/2 maple syrup
1/3 c. tahini
1.5 cup mashed sweet potato (or pumpkin puree, or applesauce)
1 c. rice milk
1 c. grated carrot
1/2 c. grated golden beet

4. Pour wet ingredients into dry ingredients. Mix until just blended. Fill greased muffin cups just to the top.

5. Bake 350F for 35 minutes. Makes 18 full-size muffins.

6. Break into little bits and put in baby's mouth. Give him some bits to hold. Say "Umm!" along with him.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

Quiet Ill

After three days pain, some relief from the flu. There has been chaos every which way.
Then the baby’s turn begins
with a cry, a little head standing by my pillow.
I pick him up, and something silky and warm
wets my shoulder, his neck, the pillow,
the towels, the cloth diapers laid down. Over and over
through the dark night, he vomits out
complete composure and an uncomplaining sweetness.

I think of my own groaning and feverish thrash.
How much was refusing to be there, just there, as trusting and open as this little boy?

Saturday, February 07, 2009

Where the Treasure Lies

It’s a lazy weekend, and my sister in law comes over to visit us and play with the baby. She has been to banks all over town looking for the safe deposit box where her mother’s jewelry was kept. She was relieved to find all the pieces she remembered. Thank goodness her mom hadn’t hidden it around the house, where it might be missed by those going through the dead woman’s effects.

My sister in law opens an unusually heavy little box full of tangled chains. One by one, she takes out necklaces, bracelets, and earrings to see if I want them.

As we talk, my chest feels funny and my voice doesn’t sound quite right. Apparently I’m not accustomed to being offered gold in bulk. On one hand, it’s quite enticing to be faced with so much yellow metal. Perhaps because of that, my more conscious self is worried about looking greedy in the wake of my mother-in-law’s death.

Ought I to accept any of this? My sister in law regards me steadily. It can remain a family asset, she assures me. If I’ll enjoy it, I should take it and have the use of it.

You could say the same of any material thing, couldn’t you? When you die, you leave everything behind. What we call ownership is really a long-term rental, a guarantee of rights to use something while you can.

Before I know it, I am the guardian of three high-karat necklace chains and a jade Hotei pendant. The baby scoots around wearing a pair of gold jingle-bell anklets handed down from his cousins. His every move makes an infuriating din. He picks at the metal, puzzled.

I have gold. And it gives me a rueful feeling in my heart. Like guilt, perhaps.

My mother in law worked so hard, and had no luxury in her life. She never wore her jewelry until right before the end, when her body was swollen with illness. The last time I saw her, she wore a beautiful gold chain over an old sweatshirt. She fingered the pendant as we talked. I couldn’t tear my eyes away from it; I knew it meant something. At the time I didn’t know, but I think she intuited how few days actually remained.

This gold of hers is about more than just adornment. There are numerous items from the safe-deposit box that my mother in law surely never planned to wear. She had no use for the heavy men’s chain bracelets or, as a Buddhist, for the gold crucifix. These are a legacy of the old days in her country, when inflation and violence meant you needed to have your wealth close at hand. A gold bracelet might buy a bag of rice; a bag of rice might buy a gold bracelet. From the stories I hear, it did.

By the time my husband’s family came to the US, their gold had all been redeemed to buy something more precious. This current trove of rings and necklaces was gathered in this country, in spite of the FDIC’s guarantee on bank deposits—and more tellingly, in spite the social stability that most of us take for granted. The majority of us have never lived in a collapsing society, or run for our lives. For those who have, a pile of gold means a hope security.

In the end, though, we are actually all running for our lives, in a race we cannot win, on a course whose end rapidly approaches. In reality, there is no true security in gold or any other possesion. None of this metal changes how my mother in law’s time came; none of it redeems our lost future with her.

What is left now, beyond the end? Rather than security, this gold now holds a memory. It is a small token from a life of little beauty and much hard, hard work.

In the evening, I slowly put one of the chains around my neck. I have to fumble for a while to put it on. The bright yellow 24 karat gold is so pure and soft that it deforms easily. The clasp is different: you must bend it open and bend it back closed. You cannot just take these Asian-style chains on and off at whim; wearing them involves a commitment. You wear the chain, and it wears you.

That night, and into the next day, I am bathed in the gold’s marvelous warmth. I feel a tremendous love for my baby and for my husband. The world seems complete, beautiful, and totally sufficient just as it is. When I look in the mirror I see an impossibly yellow, radiant, bright, ornate blessing around my neck. Like the ring on my finger, it symbolizes a bond to the family I have joined; a bond to the heritage that my son carries mixed with my own, in his veins. My heart feels larger than my chest can contain. The heavy links around my neck have enriched my blood, and made the whole world golden.

Perhaps this light, and this blessing, is her final gift to us.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

Jizo



Originally uploaded by rachepol

Friday, January 09, 2009

If you don't change direction, you'll end up where you're headed....

Lately I have been seeing children as timeless beings, already whole but focused on developing and blooming into maturity.

My husband is out of town, so the baby and I have been taking care of each other. Tonight, after K was done sitting at his new little eating table, I took my turn. He stood next to me and kept up a companionable interaction.

Suddenly, I aspirated a grain of rice, and coughed. For some reason, K is really perturbed by coughing. He can be in deep slumber, but if someone coughs, he jolts awake crying. Tonight, worry flashed across his face, and then an uncertain smile, in anticipation of my reassurance.

I patted my chest. "I'm fine, honey. Just a little rice."

He looked me in the eye, coughed twice, and patted my chest.

This sort of thing may be why I have the sense that there is considerable understanding residing in this tiny 9-month-old's baby mind.

This baby was really keen on saying "mamama" and "baba" (papa) two weeks ago. But now is only word is "ub" (up). He doesn't reach his arms up, or even use the ASL sign I've modeled every single time I pick him up. He just looks at you and says "ub" in a completely matter-of-fact tone. And sure enough, you pick him up!

He is an inveterate wiggler, and he doesn't like to hold still to have his diaper changed. But if you ask him to hold still, and then count to three, he holds still. Papa discovered this.

It was predicted from our horoscopes when the baby was born that he and I would be very much in synch with each other, and we are. Spending time together seems effortless this week. There's an easy harmony to our company. When things aren't going well--every once in a while I get bent out of shape--the baby gets cantankerous and his sleep goes all to hell.

The other day I was noticing the usual fantasies about doing something "real" and "important" with my life, maybe embarking on a career at last, or going back to school. As if I haven't had enough opportunity to learn that the conventional path isn't my natural course! But anyway, there I was, and I realized: if my son is going to be happy and peaceful, *I* need to be happy and peaceful. Maybe some moms can be stressed and wrestle with life and still have happy children, but that's not us.

I may go to school, or I may tutor again, or I may look into patent law. Or I may realize my dream of starting a book hand-bindery (really). I may stay home for years and homeschool my kids instead. Whatever I do, conflict-ridden, dysfunctional workplaces are not an option. A hectic pace of life that disrupts our ease is not an option. Knowing this is nice. I don't need a galaxy of options. I can only do one thing at a time. And I am doing the right thing for right now.

Whatever I do, one thing is certain: this little fellow will continue becoming who he is. I recognize his newborn self in the bigger baby. And someday I will recognize this charming, energetic, curious, sweetheart in the body of a grown man; I pray that day will come. Until then, we will turn our hearts ever in the right direction, and take it one step at a time.

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Knowing and Not Knowing

My son has been busy lately reminding me how fruitless it is to broadcast one’s opinion to the marketplace. Actually, he’s just been busy fighting nap time. But it works out the same. I am feeling pretty humble on the whole topic of babies and sleep.
Ironically, I recently posted a summary of a popular baby-sleep book on my “public” parenting blog— a posting inevitably saturated with opinion. Ironically, right about the time of that self-assured post, the baby’s nap and bedtime behavior turned bizarre.

The reason for this deviation from his prior perfection is difficult to guess. The baby has been sick; he could certainly be growing; he could be teething; all these can affect sleep. Perhaps these darkest days of winter, and the once-in-thirty-year snowdrifts piled outside, have derailed his tiny circadian clock.

Speculation aside, the fact is, the baby has ceased to be a happy napper. He now goes limp, arches his back, and complains at the very mention of the word. (We would be be bragging about this feat of language recognition if the circumstances were more pleasing.) In the bedroom, he cries, nurses for a few moments, and then breaks free. He scoots off, yelling, to explore the closet or escape out the door. When he’s finally really tired, but not able to sleep, he bounces and hammers a tune with his arms in the darkness. Baffled, I hold him in the darkness and feel my illusions of mastery slip away.

Probably any experienced parent has felt this. You think you know how your kids work, and you're right--until you don’t, and you aren't. Certainly, my own nine months of parenting do not an expert make. A few more years of parenting will earn me little authority. Even parenting multiple children of one’s own doesn't necessarily render one an expert where other people’s progeny are concerned. Kids are just too impermanent for that.

But does that stop us from having an opinion? Heck, no. Opinions are far too delicious. And even experts are not immune. Judith Warner, a NY Times columnist, recently owned up to this humbled-but-wiser phenomenon.

I was puzzled that Warner’s book, “Perfect Madness,” could be so disagreeable, while her columns are wise and perceptive. “Perfect Madness” seems to be grounded in a resentment of the constellation of ways that mothers and children are psychologically twined together. Warner argues that a civilized society ought discourage excessive interdependence and promote some boundaries. In some cases I could see her point—all parents ought to have high-quality childcare as an option. But I actually do believe, based on my own experience, that a mother and a tiny baby are one being in two bodies. Without claiming to know much beyond that, I sense the book is coming from a starker place.

I truly object to Warner’s dismissal of the spiritual aspects of parenting in “Perfect Madness.” For many women, having a baby and a young child strips you of your pride, of your imagined competence, of your sense of controlling anything in life. In Buddhist terms, the experience destroys some of the central conceits of the Self. In birthing and caring for my little boy, I recognize the ardent selflessness of my past monastic life applied to a concrete and valuable cause. The experience may occasionally be devastating, but it’s also healthy, and it ripens a person.

The riddle—of how I could find myself in such opposition to an author whose columns I treasure—was solved in Warner’s latest piece for the NY Times:

I find myself these days, to a surprising degree, dealing with the problem of enmeshment. This surprises me because not so long ago I wrote a book that was largely a polemic against enmeshment: against the boundary collapsing that I think is the signature characteristic of motherhood (and parenthood) in our time.

How different I was back in the period that led up to the writing of “Perfect Madness”…. I choked on the proud effusions of identity dissolution….I despised the cliché 'you can only be as happy as your least happy child.' What drivel this was, I thought. What self-indulgence. Wasn’t it a parent’s responsibility to remain whole in the face of a child’s unhappiness, the better to buoy him or her through difficult times?

And yet, with time, only the philosophy stayed intact. Emotionally, the boundaries steadily dissolved.


None of us are who we once were. Life, and parenthood, aren’t done with us ‘till they’re done. The Mama trap here is not in the ideas, in their correctness or incorrectness; the trap is in the assumption that we have arrived at the answer—the golden answer to everything—that has somehow eluded every other parent. We’re so thrilled by our own insight that we are unable to imagine that it might belie an intermediate or incomplete understanding. Because we are human, and because parenthood the first time around is such a desperate search for mastery in a new and unpredictable realm, this mistake happens, again and again. We humans excel at making data out of a trend in our own subjective experience, and then gaily telling everyone about our grand discovery.

With increasing clout comes the potential for increasing embarrassment. Unlike Judith Warner, I don’t have the pleasure of seeing our ideas published in hardcover. But then again, I don’t have to face the fact that countless hard copies of my obsolete opinion continue to circulate. At least a blog post can be deleted.

I do believe in one truth where parenting is concerned: You cannot force a person to eat, to sleep, or to toilet against their will.

I certainly cannot force my son to nap. The good advice in the book I reviewed is helpful: attune to your kid’s schedule; do the same routine before bed, and so forth. But there’s only so much you can do. My own mother missed this subtle fact, I think, when she browbeat the toddler me into staying in bed— not daring to come downstairs, no matter what—until the kitchen timer said it was time for Sesame Street. I spent a lot of time watching the timer and feeling distressed.

My recourse in this situation is the emotional enmeshment Judith Warner once scorned. I ask myself, How is the baby experiencing all this? What might be going on to make him so averse to napping? How can I make things more conducive to sleep? This is the quality of compassion, so revered in the Buddhist tradition: looking at the situation from the baby’s perspective.

Besides compassion, the other major quality to be cultivated Dharma path is wisdom. On a very practical and mundane level, you could say the wisdom of this situation lies in recalling what naps are actually for. Convenient though they may be, the baby’s naps are not for my benefit, but for his. He needs to grow, internally and externally; he needs to recharge his baby batteries. I may need to clean the house, or do some writing—I may crave a nap of my own—but really napping is for the baby, period. Remembering this may not change what I actually do, but it modifies the spirit behind my actions. That’s better for both of us, and it may even help my son. Being grumpy is bad for me, unkind to the baby, and it certainly doesn’t give him a warm snuggly naptime vibe.

On the concrete level, I’ve moved the baby’s pallet (that’s the technical term for a zabuton adorned with bedclothes) closer to our bed. And I’ve spaced our nap-attempts out, waiting three hours rather than two, before inviting my little guy to nap.

In response to these modifications, the baby doesn’t yell as much as he used to. He does toss and turn, which is cute, and all-too-familiar from my own experience. He is napping twice as long as normal, so he gets roughly the same amount of sleep per day as before.

And that’s my story. My opinon, even. For now: late December, 2008.

Sunday, December 21, 2008

9 months later...



At first light, our night's breath melts away
Already
There is music and a baby's joy

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

Being & Non-Being Helpfully Explained



This is carved into the granite 160+ feet below ground, in the Portland MAX (regional rail) station that serves the Oregon Zoo.

When you sit long enough, this makes sense. Then, after a while, you only remember that it once made sense.

There is being.
There is non-being.
There is a not-yet-beginning-to-be-non-being.
There is a not-yet-beginning-to-be-a-not-yet-beginning-to-be-non-being.
Suddenly, there is being and non-being.
But between this being and non-being,
I really don't know which is being and which is non-being.

--Taoist Philosopher Chuang-Tzu--

The Blessing String

A year ago last July, I sat a weeklong silent retreat at Great Vow with Ajahn Amaro. Although I didn’t know it then, this retreat would be the last for a long time.

I was very much in love with my darling future husband . We parted with great affection, and all week long I could feel a tremendous yearning. Was it him I sensed, pining for me? Perhaps I felt my own yearning for him. Or perhaps there was only yearning, felt by us both but possessed by neither, straining across the miles that separated us.

I was aware of practicing hard during that retreat. I sat up at night. I did not allow myself to spend the customary day or two in mental meanderings, as had been my habit and my luxury when I lived at the monastery. I knew I was at a turning point in my life. I knew I would be doing fewer long retreats. And I was determined to understand what the future ought to hold.

My chief existential dilemma had to do with whether or not lay practice--entering married life, having a household--was really as “good” as monastic practice. Was I losing out on spiritual development by getting married? Was I throwing away all those years of hard-core sitting? Was I imagining that there was something to be attained, after all? I had been happy living a simple life on my own outside the monastery, doing long retreats whenever time and money allowed. Could I really share my time and my life with another person and not lose sight of the psychological and spiritual truths I had found in monastic practice?

Daily, during that week of contemplation, we chanted the Mangala Sutra, the Buddha’s discourse on the characteristics of an ideal life. Interestingly, the Blessed One did not advocate retreat from the world, nor did he undermine social values. Instead, he described a life of quiet steadiness and kindness:

Providing for mother and father’s support
And cherishing family,
And ways of work that harm no being,
These are the highest blessings.


There, sung to a simple melody, came the answer to my question. Nowhere in those words was there mention of greatness and glory; nowhere was asceticism promoted. Instead, a life in the world, grounded in family and community, rich in respect and mutual support, a moral life in the simplest sense, was the greatest blessing. Deep down, I felt that this was right, that it was right for me.

By the end of the retreat, I knew in my bones that marriage could be a spiritually rich path, and more than that, I sensed that the life I was about to share with my husband ought to include having a family together. This was a big shift for me, but it seemed the most natural thing in the world. Until that week, I had never wanted children, and I had no idea that parenting be a spiritual path. But I did now! It seemed to be the way I needed to go.

Perhaps it was no coincidence that this interest in family life came when it did. Although I didn’t know it, I was not alone on my cushion. The farewell with my fiancee had planted a seed, so to speak, and as I sat that week, a tiny embryo was proliferating deep inside me. The inner and the outer worlds were changing faster, and sooner, than I knew.

At the end of the retreat, Ajahn Amaro blessed and cut lengths of white cord which he tied around our wrists as a blessing and a token of our intentions. I wore one string, and took another to tie around my husband’s wrist, to symbolized what I had learned about our new life together, as spiritual partners and parents.

Thirty-nine weeks later, I knelt over a chair in the bedroom and gave birth to our son. The cord on my wrist was stained with blood and meconium, the dark muck that fills a baby’s gut before he is born. After that, it was no longer white, but a suspicious dusky grey color.

Last Friday, I hiked uphill with the baby in a carrier. Near the waterfall where the koi slide under the water, my son grabbed for a camellia and stuffed a leaf in his mouth. I pried it out, or so I thought. At the bottom of the hill, he burst out coughing and choking. His eyes turned red; he looked extremely worried. We both did; I had never seen him that distressed, and there was little I could do. When he recovered, I took him home, put him down, and saw something in his mouth. The leaf was in there, a fragment still stuck to his cheek. Gingerly avoiding his chompy teeth, I hooked my little finger into his mouth and brought out the shard of camellia leaf.

As I pulled the leaf from the baby’s mouth, the string on my wrist fell to the floor.
I’m not sure how the string broke, or when. But in that moment of worry for my son and gratitude that he was safe, it seemed to me that the string acted as a charm, so common in Asian folktales, taking the baby’s misfortune upon itself and receiving the harm that would otherwise have come to him.

The string, and the bit of leaf, are here with me as I write this. Two unremarkable pieces of debris in what I pray will be an unremarkable, steady, and blessed life.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Parenting as Practice

I came across this interview with Jon Kabat-Zinn and his wife Myla about Mindful Parenting.

This quote from Jon sums up their philosophy, and mine too, these days:

I believe that spiritual practice is about life, not about retreat from life. The real work of spiritual practice in any tradition is to come to a deep understanding about what it means to be human.

Sometimes it's wonderful to just be very, very still for long periods of time, but for most of us, that can only happen occasionally. The real meditative practice is to open up to the full range of what happens in life. And parenting is a fantastic arena for doing that kind of spiritual training. It's as much a potential door into enlightenment as anything else.

It's interesting to look at your children as live-in Zen masters who can put their finger on places where you're resistant, or thinking narrowly, in ways no one else can. You can either lose your mind and your authenticity in the process of reacting to all of that stuff, or you can use it as the perfect opportunity to grow and nourish your children by attending to what is deepest and best in them and in yourself.


Jon Kabat-Zinn's impressive work bringing meditation to the mainstream has included promoting MBSR, Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction, as a complementary medical treatment. Something parents--and people everywhere--can benefit from.

Thanks to Lekshe's Tibetan Buddhist Resources for Kids for the link!

Saturday, November 22, 2008

Into the Cycles of Life, with Baby


The baby is no longer a creature from the deep. He has thoroughly become a denizen of this world. He struggles to stand at the window, and looks for as long as he can at the courtyard, at the empty fountain and the naked trees. He eagerly watches a little video of himself in the tub—does he remember, last night?—and yells proudly at his splashing image.

He sucks his lips forlornly, and bangs toys against his sore mouth. Tired and cranky from so much teething, he quietly holds still so I can hoist him into the carrier on my back. We walk out into the world. He bucks in the carrier, hoping to get me to sing and jounce him as we walk.

The night bein’ dark and very cold
A woman took pity on a poor old soul
She took pity on a poor old soul and asked him to come in.
With a tooroo roo roo ranten high and a too roo roo roo ranten high
Tooroo roo roo ranten high and high for the beggar man

…
Who knows how long I’ve loved you
You know I love you still
Will it take a lonely lifetime
If you want me to, I will
Love you forever and forever
Love you with all my heart
Love you whenever we’re together
Love you when we’re apart


At first the song makes him laugh, but soon he rests his head against my back and watches the world go by. After yesterday’s deluge of warm rain, the world smells clean. Wispy clouds ride high in the sky. Everybody on the street walks as if time is precious, feeling the hours until autumn rains resume.

When we come home, it’s all been too much somehow. He bounces back and forth between toys and breast, restless and worn thin. Then we hear the sound of papa on the stairs. The door opens to peals of dazzling baby laughter, smiles, and much waving of tiny arms.

They play together while I fry some fish for dinner. I make three bowls: two of rice, fish, and roasted vegetables; and a tiny one with coarsely-mashed avocado and roasted veggies. The baby holds one spoon in his fist and practices dropping it and picking it up while we guide spoonfuls of food into his mouth. Eventually, he looks to me, twisting and crying in his seat.

We all go into the bathroom. I hop in the tub to get clean while papa familiarizes the baby with the toothbrush. It’s not really about cleaning teeth at this point, more building good habits and getting comfortable with brushing and, from the baby’s point of view, massaging his aching gums.

Lately my days with the baby have been very peaceful, with a harmonious undertone that I associate with happy mammals. It’s the feeling of a body of many bodies, a congregation of monks moving together in their robes, a pack of animals functioning as one, a contented group of souls in limbic resonance with one another.

This entrainment of biorhythms is explored in A General Theory of Love. The psychiatrist authors of that book, one of my all-time favorites, describe how we intuitively instinctively pick up on one another, how we sense anxiety, panic, and warm-heartedness, and how multiples of us resolve into one macro-organism. Being around happy people makes you happy; for a nascent human with a highly plastic brain, positive entrainment is the key to future positive emotional disposition and bonding patterns.

Beyond neural connectivity, this sensation has physiological underpinnings. Meditators know they often breathe in unison with others; as a bodyworker I would frequently feel my heartbeat falling into time with a client’s pulse. Because of this natural falling into rhythm, premature twins thrive better, and their vital signs are stronger, when they are placed together in an incubator.

So no wonder then, as the baby and I cuddled together for a nap today, that I felt his heartbeat—my hand was in his armpit—keeping perfect time with my the throb of my own pulse in my neck and chest.

In spite of the pain of teething, in spite of his writhing around trying to nurse comfortably, in spite of the sleepless fussing, there is our synchrony. Today I sat zazen while the baby napped behind me on the bed. After thirty minutes or so, I came to the surface, and thought I heard a rustle. I turned to look at the bed, and there was my son, eyes alight, quietly giving me a conspiratorial smile. I laughed, and he laughed. I scooped him up and we bounded over to the potty, where he deposited a great big peepee, cooing happily and glowing pinkly from sleep.